PDA

View Full Version : Tortugas Fishing Ban


jfjf
11-15-2006, 10:26 AM
Bush, Cabinet OK Tortugas fishing ban, Crist dissents
Tuesday November 14, 2006
By BILL KACZOR
Associated Press Writer
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) The final element needed to complete the largest marine reserve in North America off Florida's southwest coast won approval Tuesday from Gov. Jeb Bush and the state Cabinet.

The panel voted 3-1 for a management plan banning fishing in a 61 square-mile section of Dry Tortugas National Park in the Gulf of Mexico and Florida Straits about 75 miles west of Key West.

The new Research Natural Area will be added to the existing Tortugas Ecological Reserve, where fishing has been prohibited since 2001. Combined the two areas will prohibit fishing in 261 square miles.

The area is designed to help overfished species such as grouper and red snapper recover. It also will provide scientists with a living laboratory and divers and other visitors with recreational and educational opportunities.

``It's good for the fish; it's good for the ecosystem; it's good for fishermen,'' said University of Miami marine biologist Jerald Ault, who testified in support of the plan.

The only dissenting vote was cast by Attorney General Charlie Crist, also Florida's governor-elect.

``I am reluctant to restrict a freedom from individual recreational fishermen and fisherwomen,'' Crist said.

In announcing his vote, Crist spoke fondly of growing up fishing with his father and how that helped cement their bond.

Bush and the Cabinet added a provision that would restore fishing after five years without another vote.

Their approval was the final step before the management plan is published in the Federal Register. It previously had been approved by the federal Office of Management and Budget and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, which will have an enforcement role.

Conservation Commission chairman Rodney Barreto said his panel was unanimous although it usually opposes fishing bans.

``If we're going to have a no-fishing zone that would be a true laboratory out in the field, this is the place,'' Barreto said.

He said the research area is so far from shore few recreational fishermen go there. Most of the park 71.5 square miles will remain open to fishing including the area immediately surrounding Fort Jefferson, where most anglers congregate.

Monroe County commissioners and several environmental groups supported the proposal including the Ocean Conservancy, Audubon Society, Nature Conservancy and Florida Wildlife Federation.

The only opposing comment came from Ted Forsgren, executive director of the Coastal Conservation Association of Florida, a recreational fishing group. He said a fishing ban should be a last resort and that his group would support alternatives such as bag limits and catch-and-release requirements.

Forsgren disputed proponents' argument that protecting fish in the restricted areas would help repopulate other waters along Florida's east and west coasts. He said fish will migrate the other way.

``Fish aren't stupid,'' he said. ``They're going into these areas because they're not hassled in these areas.''

Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson also had questioned the need for a ban, citing studies that show fish stocks have increased dramatically in recent years.

Bronson voted for it, though, after Ault said those fish as still young and have low reproduction rates. They need a chance to mature so they can produce offspring at rates high enough to restore fish populations, he said.

(Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
In the interest of timeliness, this story is fed directly from the Associated Press newswire and may contain occasional typographical errors.

Spear One
11-15-2006, 10:33 AM
Well, at least Crist held up his end. At least they put a 5 year limit on it.

WreckDiver
11-15-2006, 10:42 AM
Jerry Aults BS data strikes again. The five yr deadline will get renewed.


Hey at least they will keep the idiot fish hugers (that cannot control them selves) off the reefs, never mind I see they are still alllowed.



Aults BS



Forsgren took issue, though, with the premise that no-fishing zones will increase fish populations beyond the reserve’s boundary. Citing a study of a reserve near Cape Canaveral, Forsgren said more fish enter marine reserves than leave them. “Fish aren’t stupid,” he said.

He also cited a study, led by University of Miami marine biologist Jerald Ault, that showed grouper and snapper populations are on the rise at Dry Tortugas National Park despite recreational fishing being allowed there.

Ault said Forsgren is oversimplifying both studies. The population bump is attributable to increases in the number of small juvenile fish that need years, maybe a decade, to reproduce at a high rate.

“We’re seeing changes that lead us to believe we’re moving in the right direction,” Ault said. “We’re a long way from recovery.”

Nsearch
11-15-2006, 11:02 AM
Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson also had questioned the need for a ban, citing studies that show fish stocks have increased dramatically in recent years.


Where are these studies?? :confused:

WreckDiver
11-15-2006, 11:04 AM
He voted for it anyway.

Bronson voted for it, though, after Ault said those fish as still young and have low reproduction rates. They need a chance to mature so they can produce offspring at rates high enough to restore fish populations, he said.



And here is whats next.

junior
11-15-2006, 03:58 PM
I'm confused...I thought only democrats were the tree-huggers that wanted to take away our fishing rights.

WreckDiver
11-15-2006, 04:10 PM
I'm confused...I thought only democrats were the tree-huggers that wanted to take away our fishing rights.



I thought I explained this in another thread :confused: :confused: :bashhead:

kryzun
11-15-2006, 04:59 PM
Is this for real? Saw it on CNN too, More lost fishing access.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/15/fla.fish.ap/index.html