apnea_complex
01-12-2007, 02:15 AM
I guess I will start a storm. This is from larsonblog.com A talk show host here in San Diego. He shreds the gnar...
...is George W. Bush. Many Democrats in DC have greater disdain for Bush than they do for the terrorists. They feel compassion for Saddam ("Oh, why couldn't he have been hanged without taunts?")And they would prefer it if America would lose the war in Iraq... so they can be "right". Now the left is horrified that the President would dare bring Syria and Iran into the discussion, putting the countries on notice that we're not going to tolerate their involvement with the insurgency. People like Keith Olberman are shocked that the President would suggest complicity. Well, what Bush discussed is reality. It's also something several Democrat "leaders" want to ignore. They'd rather play on the emotions of people, who are understandibly fatigued by the situation. It's partly Bush's fault that he hasn't regularly explained the war effort as clearly as he did tonight. He's also allowed the opposition to make him appear more weak than he already is on many issues. Here's the text of his speech to the nation: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070110-7.html
On NBC's Brian Williams and MSNBC's Chris Matthews thought it was important to note that GWB was speaking from the White House library--- where Jimmy Carter gave his first fireside chat. Egad. They're on the same talking points in the lib effort to canonize Carter? Again, it proves the point: They're so committed to taking down Bush, to claiming Iraq is Vietnam, to pretending the War on Terror is a figment of Bush's imagination that they appear willing to empower the bad guys with new resolve. And Dems allow Turban Durbin to do the "response" to Bush. These people are dangerous for America. God help us.
...is George W. Bush. Many Democrats in DC have greater disdain for Bush than they do for the terrorists. They feel compassion for Saddam ("Oh, why couldn't he have been hanged without taunts?")And they would prefer it if America would lose the war in Iraq... so they can be "right". Now the left is horrified that the President would dare bring Syria and Iran into the discussion, putting the countries on notice that we're not going to tolerate their involvement with the insurgency. People like Keith Olberman are shocked that the President would suggest complicity. Well, what Bush discussed is reality. It's also something several Democrat "leaders" want to ignore. They'd rather play on the emotions of people, who are understandibly fatigued by the situation. It's partly Bush's fault that he hasn't regularly explained the war effort as clearly as he did tonight. He's also allowed the opposition to make him appear more weak than he already is on many issues. Here's the text of his speech to the nation: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070110-7.html
On NBC's Brian Williams and MSNBC's Chris Matthews thought it was important to note that GWB was speaking from the White House library--- where Jimmy Carter gave his first fireside chat. Egad. They're on the same talking points in the lib effort to canonize Carter? Again, it proves the point: They're so committed to taking down Bush, to claiming Iraq is Vietnam, to pretending the War on Terror is a figment of Bush's imagination that they appear willing to empower the bad guys with new resolve. And Dems allow Turban Durbin to do the "response" to Bush. These people are dangerous for America. God help us.